Death from vaccination in a Berlin home for the elderly
Translation from edited transcript, both by Paul Gregory.
Many passages or individual words were hard to decipher, partly due to the disguise of the whistleblower’s voice, but also because the participants were speaking very colloquially, with false starts and incomplete sentences. Points which could not be heard sufficiently clearly are marked by “-----“.
There is a sub-titled video, where the transcript and translation was done separately.
Reiner Füllmich: So, you work in a home for elderly people and there is there a section, a floor, where only dementia sufferers are accommodated. Is that correct?
Whistleblower: That is correct.
RF: So that were 36 people at the end of December last year, thirty-six people. Of those thirty-one were vaccinated, three were not vaccinated for reasons we do not know or for health reasons, I assume, and two died normally due to old age.
Whistleblower: Exactly. In the case of the three, their relatives refused.
RF: They were not vaccinated. Are they still alive?
Whistleblower: They are still alive and their relative refused permission to vaccinate them.
RF: Very good; And they have not had any problems beyond those they had prior to the others’ being vaccinated.
RF: Now we have 31 people who have been vaccinated. How many of those died after the vaccination?
RF: And an eighth person, you assume, that they have been so badly harmed by the vaccination that they will not make and they too will die?
Whistleblower: Yes, without a doubt.
RF: You assume that that will happen in the next two or three days?
Whistleblower: We assume about three days.
------- morphine ------. And we assume that they will die soon.
RF: How is that? Were there further harms after the second vaccination, and did the second vaccination only affect these 31, „only“ in inverted commas, or rather, those who are still alive, or were other people vaccinated?
Whistleblower: hm, it is affecting, at the moment, are lot of people are poorly hm. The symptoms are different this time than with the first vaccination. More are affected.
RF: So the side affects after the second vaccination appear among those who have been vaccinated a second time, there is no-one who has received the “second” vaccination who did not receive the first-phase vaccination, is that correct?
RF: But the symptoms are more serious?
Whistleblower: Exactly. There are 21 who received the second phase vaccination.
RF: Twenty-one? Yes. No wonder, if seven are already dead, and one at death's door, then there are not so many left that can be received the second phase vaccination. And with this second vaccination, what were the symptoms that occurred?
Whistleblower: In this time great tiredness, listlessness edema-formation, especially in the legs right, itching.
Viviane F: You also spoke of gasping for breath.
Whistleblower: Correct. But that has only occurred now. about two days ago, with two of the residents who were suddenly gasping for breath. -- what ---- not really ascertained, racing ---- and getting insufficient oxygen and ----- They have had that two or three times a day.
RF: All only after the first vaccination, that did not happen previously?
RF: Do you know that the vaccination dosages which were applied were three times those of what would have been necessary? No, or?
Whistleblower: No. We generally had nothing to do with the vaccination dosage. What happened was that a vaccination team came, the German armed forces, and the regular doctors helped with the vaccination and staff --- went through, three of them, that is, one carer, one doctor and one soldier.
RF: What role did the soldiers play?
Whistleblower: Well, in this special area, I have to say that no-one can tell me that ----- the ill people --- that is both physically and psychologically, is not violence both the PCR-test and the vaccination. The residents cannot take it.
Horrifyingly I have to say that on the first vaccination the residents were so intimidated by the military that they stay sat, they were completely different.
We have our “walkers”, that is, they are always on their feet.
When the army was there, --- they were like petrified.
---- one must not forget. They were victims of war, it was isolated, we had had almost no visitors and suddenly six total strangers come in, who simply run through, then army people standing staunch in their uniforms, and with the vaccination in eye
and the people they were really intimidated.
RF: So you have the impression that the people, who are all so old that they had still experienced the war?
Have I understood that correctly? ----
RF: that the people were so intimidated by the mere presence of those recognisable to them as soldiers that they were as if intimidated compared with their normal behaviour and were quiet?
Whistleblower: Completely, completely. We know the people differently. We know, rather, that we have our walkers, as we call them, who are really always on their feet, remained seated.
Normally they walk around when eating, but scarcely is the military there, they just remained seated, which is not normally usual with these people.
RF: These soldiers, that were there, had, they were recognisable as such, because they were wearing uniforms.
RF: Yes, because otherwise the effect would not have occurred.
But I have heard that people who saw them come and depart, noted that they were in civilian cars, not in army cars. Is that also correct?
Viviane F: What technical function did the soldiers have?
Did they see to the vaccines? Or what was their task?
Whistleblower: It seemed to me that it was always about the vaccine. They stood around the trolley all the time. And the trolley was always directly where the doctor and the carer were.
Viviane F:____ ------ also mixed
Whistleblower: Mixing was in a separate room --- and the vaccination team behind. The soldiers fetched it. I did not see it myself.
RF: What was the function of these soldiers? Were they there to guard the vaccine so that no-one could take any? Or what was it, did anyone say why they were there?
Whistleblower: No, nothing was said, but it had its effect, the appearance was that they were indeed there to guard the vaccine. And now for me quite clearly, in order to make a statement for the elderly. You really noticed the intimidation. They were not the old residents, who did of their own accord what they do instinctively, but they sat there, completely still and quiet.
Viviane F: Did they express fear, could they put that in words?
Whistleblower: One could see it on their faces. It was a different behaviour afterwards and they were very intimidated. They were very quiet, even subdued, then on top there was the tiredness.
I do not know if that came from the vaccination, might have been the reason, but it was a different ----, I have to say.
Viviane F: hmm, very briefly, again. Can you say the symptoms again, how they developed with the first, the first vaccination.
How quickly did that happen? Or was it a bit different, a matter of the character. What were you able to observe there?
Whistleblower: As a small example. We had one resident, he was superfit, although clearly limited due to his age. However, his problem was mainly the dementia. He had been an opera singer, he had danced, jogged, played the piano, on the day we are talking about, somehow, not twenty-four hours later, within thirty minutes, he had a strong tremor, did not get enough air, no longer had enough oxygen. He rapidly turned so very poorly that we took him to hospital right away. Before, though, there was an instruction from the doctor that I should check whether he had an infection in the urinary tract, what did not look like a urinary infection. Of course there was mention that might be the vaccination. We did a rapid test, he was indeed positive, went to hospital. The theatre is always the same topic, it can only be Covid. So no-one looked at whether it was maybe the vaccination in combination with Covid, or is it only the vaccination, and so also I was always told right away, "It is only Covid." There was one really good doctor, and he said quite clearly, who is it only Covid that plays a role here? Why not the vaccination? We must look at both points. But this did not happen.
RF: Can we take up contact with him?
Whistleblower: I do not know, I cannot say.
>>>> at 10 Minutes <<<<
Viviane F: Did the patient remain positive, or was that only in the rapid tests?
Whistleblower: ----- hospital ---- and when he returned, however, he was negative. But he is no better.
RF: Until then he was, “fit,” he could jog, play the piano, and he could still sing, couldn’t he?
Whistleblower: He had been an opera singer. He sang super. When we jogged together he wore me out. He was physically so well that he once shamed us, that was quite clear.
RF: And then, suddenly, complete physical collapse?
RF: How is his condition now?
Whistleblower: That is the gentleman who is dying.
RF: Oh no! And fortunately at least he was not vaccinated again?
Whistleblower: On that date he was still in hospital.
Viviane F: And he never had any symptoms of Covid but precisely this fatigue, he did not have any a respiratory infection or anything?
Whistleblower: Nothing at all Nothing at all Nothing at all. That was the topic with the regular doctor, where we said, even with the suspicion ---- Covid ---- no temperature, nothing. It was clear, Covid vaccination, 24 hours later, things not as they should be. And it cannot have been Covid.
RF: The symptoms that you describe, from what we have understood to date, have nothing to do with Covid. Those are completely different symptoms, they are reported internationally, from many countries, from many carehomes, in particular because it is the aged who are first in line, one has to say for crying out loud, similar reports come, but they are not Covid symptoms. Covid symptoms are flu-like, and maybe loss of taste and the like, but what you describe here, with this drastic death, seven people within the shortest of time and the eighth on his deathbed ---- that is something we have not heard before.
You also said something about the process of dying being different to what you normally witness. Can you describe that again?
Whistleblower: Well, some carers, not only myself, but other staff too, we talk about thse things of course. We have of course seen many people die, accompanied many dying people, and as a rule it was always a peaceful death among the older people, that is, they have accepted and let go. It was a pleasant breathing, the eyes closed, one could calm them with one’s presence. Now I must say very clearly: this is a different dying, as though they cannot let go, as if they torment themselves, as if they not yet, I don’t know, sense that it was not yet their turn to die. Thus the eyes are restless, this strong tremor, changed breathing, the face colour is also quite different, they are very restless, this trembling, with gasping for air violently. Sure, there is a phase when dying, the gasping for breath again at the end, that is only again gasping for air, that is a different breathing. You know, I cannot describe it, they really pant for air, as if something, the body, will simply not yet or the head does not want yet at all or they cannot simply let go and die peacefully. It is not a human dying is what I want to say.
Viviane F: That sounds terrible. It is. Can the people still be spoken to at that moment, or do they look at one consciously, or is it really, have they completely stepped away now in this special form of dying?
Whistleblower: It is as if, well, I am sure, they sense if someone is there, of that I am sure, but it is, a looking away, that is, they had a completely different regard. This empty looking away, this drift with the eyes. It cannot be described, it is different, it is definitely different, it is a different dying that happens to the dying which I am used to seeing.
RF: That which you describe, in inverted commas. as “normal,” a peaceful letting go, and that their struggle for survival, can one see it like that, or in struggle against something, or how would you perceive it?
Whistleblower: With the other cases of dying, it is said that there are particular people, they have something, they need something still in order to let go and to accept that they must die, like that someone has come, that someone was there, something was missing. But they could always let go in peace. That was a peaceful dying. And now it is, as I said, this constant trembling in the upper body. this tremor, which I do not know, what was observable among very many, this changed skin colour,
then this look, this uncanny, fearful look, as if they sense that it did not have to be, or it was not yet their time to go.
RF: It is neither peaceful, nor, on your impression, the people who are now dying after the vaccination are in a position to let go but it is more like a struggle.
Whistleblower: It is a struggle, it is not a dignified dying.
Viviane F: Now I must ask again: the dementia patients, who normally can otherwise be spoken to, If now a dementia patient speaks under normal circumstances, they die then, would it also be possible that they maybe say a few words, perhaps in the very last minutes or hours, perhaps not more ----- but here there seems to be no essential connection more and maybe [has not] for some time or have I understood that wrongly?
Whistleblower: Yes, we do have some who ---- strong change in nature, that is also exactly some hours previously, that did not happen now. With many dying people they say then Mama or God. And now there is ---- and now there is, rather, a complete quiet, where nothing more comes. The body reacts differently.
RF: What happened after the second vaccination? Do you fear something even worse? You see at the moment, what is the situation at the moment and what do you assume?
Whistleblower: It is different to the first time. Now, as said, about two, three days ago, there come again symptoms which are somewhat worse. I cannot say. I cannot make a forecast. I hope from my heart not, but it does not look that way. Many are still in a poorly state.
RF: How many people are in a poorly state?
Whistleblower: We have different vaccination symptoms. We have, and this is very striking, this tiredness, this lethargy, this change in character, poorer walking, on account of the tiredness or musculature, that deteriorates. And this not being able to motivate properly to anything, scarcely walking, scarcely eating, what is semi-permanent is this sleeping. So basically I’d say that there are eleven who are faring poorly.
RF: Eleven? Thirty-one vaccinated, seven are dead, an eighth almost dead, and others are faring poorly.
RF:___ Man oh man!
>>>> 18 Minutes <<<<
Viviane F: And does the progression vary with these eleven who are affected? That is, is it one day better, worse, one has the feeling things are moving upward, and then things go downhill again, or is it more permanent with the vaccination?
Whistleblower: So, with --- first it was a bit different after a couple of days, and now with the second I’d say that it is constant -— that it stays bad, it is not extremely bad, as said, tiredness, lethargy, absence, change in character, but it tends to be constant --- that they are poorly and now a couple of things come on top, the tremor, the skin rash,
Viviane F: And again, on this change in skin colour. What is it then, is it somehow more yellow or pale or what?
Viviane F: And that is already happening to some of those who are affected?
Whistleblower: ----, some of them have had it, yes
RF: What do the relatives say?
Whistleblower: It is difficult. They alternate between not being able to accept or ---- well, one said to me very clearly, she asked me, whether it was her fault. Then I asked her what she meant and she said she had consented to the vaccination.
RF: So it does occur to one or the other that it may perhaps have something to do with the vaccination. With you it is different, you see the big picture. The individuals affected cannot know what else is happening, they only see, I gave my consent, and that possibly has killed my relative. With you it is different. You see from your observations the total picture and it imposes itself as it were – this is what I understand from your words – that it has to do with the vaccination since previously there was nothing.
Whistleblower: Exactly. It is not normal. And it cannot be a co-incidence in the care, that was already a --- never experienced, and exactly as my colleagues have never experienced, and I should like to say again not only the whole thing. Care work is already hard enough. We know that. We are short of staff --- are completely ---- They just have too much work to do. We are at our limits. but that has been the case for many years. And now through the “Pandemic” suddenly there are people who could help such as the German armed forces. Where was this “Bundeswehr” previously? Our old people need to be occupied, they need attention. Why has no-one had the idea of helping us, why has no-one supported us? And suddenly there is help. Why can’t all the money be invested. We have MSA germs, so many people die from these in hospital, --- with investments one could mitigate or prevent the disease. People suffering from cancer are not longer treated, why not? I simply do not understand it, suddenly investments are being made. Money, masks, precisely our dementia patients or psychologically ill. No care staff can tell me that it is not with violence that physical and psychological violence both with the --- PCR test that is a violent application to impose, that as too the vaccination. That is violence, physical and psychological violence, that we apply in order to do that. And that is supported by the government. The people need individual ---- joy in life, they need their loved ones, they need us as a team, the staff must enjoy working, it is only this way that we can come close to the people. What do we have now? We are under-staffed. We have masks. We no longer have any time. We keep to regulations, it is only full-up, clean, Why does no-one think about these things?
There was a young carer, he said just now in an interview,
that he had seen on the intensive care ward the fear that the people have of death. I’d like to say to you, the fear which now rules of course is the fear the people have of Covid, they have a great fear, but, as said, what I have seen in seven people that was fear. They die in fear. The people, that come to us, when I go to them and say, please, I’d like to wash you. They see me with the mask. That is fear, the people, who no longer see their next of kin, they have fear in their eyes. Why do we only ever see the Covid fears? Why not all the other fears? No visits, no loving care, no affection. And the distance keeping. I am not allowed to get close to you. What do the old people need: Affection, physical contact, time, speaking. All that, we no longer have it, since this so-called pandemic. I find it so sad what we are doing to the people, not only the patients, but also the children, doing to everyone. And that is violence, really violence. I did not recognise the ----, they walk around, they are content
when they have been washed, then they walk past us, we let them. But this time, through the presence of completely unknown people, after having been isolated for months, they had no visitors, and suddenly completely unknown people arrive.
Our people sat there, they remained seated, full of fear in their eyes, you could see it, that was fear that kept them back. And that is not normal what is happening. And it is happening in every carehome, no-one can tell me that that is not the case.
RF: Have colleagues in other carehomes reported anything similar?
RF: And among the colleagues in the carehome where you work, do they see it that way too? Have --- you spoken with them, or do they not care?
Whistleblower: There are some such and some such. Many ignore it and have got over it. Then it is like this, but we have always had our black sheep in the care sector --- really they should perhaps not work in care. We have that everywhere, there are of course also the colleagues who say it is brazen what is happening here, and that is only sad to see it continuing.
In other carehomes it is the case that the pressure in other homes is even stronger than with us. What comes across to me clearly, to us, is that somehow there is a competition between the homes, I have the feeling, we have vaccinated so and so many, so and so many colleagues have had themselves vaccinated.
As if it were our praise for the government or the carehomes boast about it. Emails are sent around “we have vaccinated ninety-seven percent" that is something really great. In order to boost the pressure for the others. I notice also the pressure especially with us staff, we would get ourselves vaccinated, we should get ourselves vaccinated. It comes up, is raised, again and again.
RF: How do the colleagues react to that?
Whistleblower: Unfortunately, some have already given in and have had themselves vaccinated.
RF: After what you have just described happened, after one could see, when one worked in the carehome, what this vaccination has done, at first sight, i.e. prima facie, have colleagues still got themselves vaccinated or have they said, oh damn, I think I'd better give that a miss?
Whistleblower: There were more that said no. And one woman, I found that very sad, she still let herself be vaccinated, from the beginning she has been against, but when I asked her, why, you were sure before, you were strong, strong in thinking and then she said, she just wanted to have her peace. She was phoned at home, and she says, “I’ll do it, then I shall finally have my peace.” And there is a small pressure. ------ group --- there the pressure is much greater. -- -------- I also asked what happens then if we hold with our stand and say we do not want it --- that is meant to be a voluntary thing. And it was whispered to me and was said there is always a domestic authority like with the PCR test is a provision, only with a negative PCR test do you come in.
If you refuse there is domestic authority and that means refusal to work and refusal to work means dismissal. There is of course a sharp pressure behind it. It was not said clearly that the situation with the vaccination is the same, but I was given the example of the PCR test. So I think that there is something behind it.
RF: How was is now with the PCR test? When the people are tested, you said to us I think that the people who were vaccinated had been tested beforehand. and they were all negative. ---- We now know that this PCR test does not say anything about an infection, but anyway it is forbidden for me to vaccinate into an illness – into an active viral event. So I assume that the people who have been vaccinated, that is, these 31 people, had previously tested negative. That is correct, isn’t it?
Whistleblower: They tested negative a couple of days previously, that is correct, however with us one ---- time. The doctor phoned after Covid came out with us and had asked very clearly, what is it with the second vaccination? We have positives, and that has been confirmed by ---. “Despite Covid positive, vaccination may go ahead.” I --- should also - was not asked on the day of the vaccination. “Does anyone have – is anyone poorly? Has anyone anything unusual?” Is anyone positive? The team just came in and vaccinated. Although we had one patient, for example, who had diarrhoea. We had people with allergies, no questions were asked, all that happened was vaccinations.
At the first date there was, for example, the situation that the doctor had vaccinated and suddenly the doctor began to shout, she is bleeding ---. Then I asked him, that is something you must know. You have the sheet with the medical history – to bleed.
---- or he said --- he looked at me, that showed his reaction.
Previously, he knows nothing at all, who he has, simply the needle in his hand, push it in, hold firm, vaccinate, and finished!
RF: So the vaccinating doctor does not know at all what is the situation with the individual patients. He does not even speak with them. I have seen pictures, he walks more or less around and, can you confirm that, that the vaccinating doctor practically did not do anything except to vaccinate and has no idea about the particular patients.
Whistleblower: I can confirm that. Neither were we asked as staff, is it --- is someone poorly. I was not asked once, nor were my colleagues. The people were not spoken to. They were vaccinated in the kitchen, while eating, they were vaccinated in the corridor and wherever they were found, everything conceivable.
RF: And on the subject of the PCR test, you also said, that was with force, the people were held, against their will, that is how it was done. Was there consent to the PCR test? Did the relatives give consent, or the guardians, or how was that?
Whistleblower: The relatives or guardians had to give consent.
RF: The patients themselves were, the residents, as you have described, they were mostly or partly not agreed to it and saw it as an assault, a violent assault, to their bodily integrity mainly or where most agreed, or said nothing?
Whistleblower: For the most part it is only possible with force.
Viviane F: Back to the doctor: Were you able to observe that he convinced himself? For example, did he have the information sheets with signature in front of him? Or someone else in this vaccination team?
Whistleblower: Apparently not, because, as said, when I asked the doctor, that is I said to him you must be the first to know whether she --- blood thinner. It is you who have just vaccinated her. And you have the sheet about her medical history, and he said very clearly No.
Viviane F: But that was not a single case, but that was general what you saw there? -----
Whistleblower: I do not believe that they informed themselves previously.
RF: You assume that the doctors who did the vaccinations – or maybe it was only one doctor – did not have any idea about the patients?
Whistleblower: Well, there was once the regular doctor that was present. She knows the residents. But there too the question was never raised of how they were faring on the day, whether there were symptoms and as always doctor – the team – never once communicated.
RF: Is that normal that a doctor who comes to a patient in your carehome has practically no idea of the patient and is not interested, but simply does whatever he considers right? Or does the doctor normally speak with the patient or their guardian or their relative?
Whistleblower: We have regular doctors – especially with us – the section is a different section because of the dementia. But we should at least have expected, when they come, that they at least speak to us as staff --- and tell me, is there anything special? Or we also have of course physically more aggressive residents, that we are asked at least, what must we be on our guard about, with which ones must we approach which way, and one knows one's people, one knows the tricks of how to handle them. But that was not how it was, they stood there, three of them, raised the clothing, held firm shortly, quickly into the zone, and then off again to mix. So that was perhaps, at most, one minute, that was invested in these residents of ours and before no questions were asked, nothing.
RF: The reaction of the patients, was, mainly after or during the first vaccination as you described, they seemed to be intimidated because of the presence of the soldiers. What was it like with the second vaccination?
Whistleblower: Well, with the first, as I said, we did not recognise our residents. We had not expected that they “tolerate” things, but it was tolerance from fear, because they were intimidated. With the second vaccination, I experienced the team as more practised, it happened in half the time, they really raced through. And the residents exactly the same. That is, complete intimidation, like with one resident, the group dynamics, these many people at one place,looks around suddenly completely strange people they were all intimidated. The one resident --- you noticed this --- had shown us as we know them to be, when there were three of them in one room, one noticed right away, she had suddenly a different attitude to us it was clear --- to her bedside --- but you noticed it. It was again her environment, she tried to resist, but that of course was not tolerated.
Viviane F: With the second vaccination, how was it, was the military there again and ---- found in the kitchen or elsewhere and were grabbed hold of or
Whistleblower: Exactly. But that was all this time as if they have really marched through and they were on form, they knew how to do it, race through, hold high, and somehow faster, much faster
Viviane F: And --- they needed half an hour for the twenty-one people, to give them the jab.
Whistleblower: I think it was even less than that.
RF: Yes, that is a rather macabre story. That what obviously affected you emotionally earlier and when you held a small monologue, that was already quite impressive. Honestly, I think that will affect people.
Viviane F: It is absolute madness what we have just heard, that is a dreadful nightmare. Above all, if you think that that is certainly not a single case in Berlin but is going on in many carehomes or in facilities for the disabled. Meanwhile we have received many messages that that happens in another carehome exactly, we are getting messages from individuals that describe exactly such events, only yesterday from a carer where the same thing happened, in Rhineland-Palatinate, and many other places and in a home for the disabled I am in contact with in North-Rhine Westphalia a very similar situation where they describe what happened shortly after the vaccination, that the people have a different colour on their faces, that they are unusually lethargic and do not get going and who knows what will happen in the next few days.
RF: I must say when I saw the video, I found it hard to bear.
My wife saw it too, who barely got through it. Afterwards I spoke with the husband of the carer from Rhineland-Palatinate because we now – I think – must act quickly so that not even more of this happens but we must assume that what we have seen is at least representative for across the country. But I assume. after everything that we have learnt in the Committee, all the letters we have received, the videos that we get, that it is representative worldwide. And that would mean twenty-five percent die and a further thirty-six percent have severe side effects and one does not know if they will survive. One could hardly put it in words. except that one sees that it looks like organised mass killing.
Viviane F: In the worst case, that is what it is. But it might also be the case that we have to do here – that they have gone astray, and think now that the vaccination is the solution. What at any rate must happen is that it must be investigated very quickly. And I am now somewhat dismayed I have to say because I drew up a criminal complaint in the matter because the Whistleblower:s here did not want themselves to put in an appearance for the moment.
for this reason I have written a criminal complaint. Now already on Friday informed the public prosecutor and the police and we have today, I have ordered a press enquiry for journalists with the police whether they are on the case, whether they are addressing it, here very briefly what the police have written to us.
The police answers “so far the police in Berlin have not undertaken any investigations in connection with the deaths you describe. Such investigations are always undertaken when a doctor, on issuing the death certificate, attests a non-natural cause of death.
Also the two deaths mentioned by you are unknown to the police. Hence here too no investigations are being undertaken nor is the corpse of the deceased being impounded. The police is in possession of criminal complaints submitted by you and they are currently being examined by a superintendent of the crime squad or rather by the Berlin public prosecutor. The press office of the public prosecutor will give information on this.” Yes, I enquired there of course. I am eager to know what comes out tomorrow as information. But we have here already the crazy situation that the police do not immediately open investigations, because here after all we have registered a capital crime, and we have therefore to do with an official duty to investigate, they must become active immediately and really look at what is happening.
We have now really supplied enough evidence for an initial suspicion, that something is not quite right, and basically the police is obliged to begin the investigations immediately.
RF: I have never heard of any such thing. It is inconceivable. I worked a little while with the public prosecutor. I left because I was so disgusted how little was done when really bad things were happening. One thing has to be seen very clearly, your criminal complaint has been submitted, there were just two dead in the Lower Rhine.
Viviane F: No, there were seven dead and a further one on his deathbed. Now the eighth one is dead as well. And in any case it is quite clear, there is after the second vaccination a further eleven persons who are poorly of the twenty-one who were vaccinated. There is imminent danger – urgency – whether for example, if the cause of death can be identified, with the others who are affected one can also perhaps intervene if they show first signs of illness but are not terminally ill. Of course, one must find out very quickly what is happening, because then one must apply the brakes of course in other carehomes and generally in all the vaccination centres and take a look at what is up here.
RF: Probably across Europe. One thing is certain: No public prosecutor can demand that one submits a complete indictment with all witnesses and best of all with video evidence. But that is what we have more or less done. You have presented such concrete suspicions with your criminal complaint that action must be taken immediately. To stand there and say, oh, no, we’ll wait for the perpetrators – this is how it must be formulated – for the perpetrators to report to us, that is, those doctors who are involved. That is more than pitiable and is quite frightening. For if that is to become normality, then no-one is safe any more, no-one, not even those who still hold to the government line and believe that everything is in order. What we have seen here, and we have spoken personally with the witnesses You have seen even with the colleagues how the soldiers marched in there and marched out again, so what we have seen here that is so pitiable that each individual, even those still with the government narrative, must stand up. Those who remain inactive and do nothing make themselves co-responsible with everything which may now happen.
Viviane F: Absolutely, the facts must come out, all of them, immediately.
We must have certainty of what is happening there and what it looks like. There is here a very considerable problem with the vaccination.
RF: That must come with our hope that in connection with the complaint of fellow lawyer Dr. Holzeisen and what our own people here have assembled for this. These are not just any people, but respected scientists. We can only hope that it triggers something at EU level. If it doesn’t, then we ask ourselves what the EU Commission is there for, what the EU is for. Maybe we would be better served with regional structures where those help each other who are actually affected. Here an alarm bell must go off in Berlin immediately. This go-slow is a gigantic scandal. I would describe that as an official body obstructing justice.